← Back to planner

Birth-year cohorts

The youth pipeline — spot weak year-classes early

This shows the number of active swimmers by birth year and age — the whole competing youth pool, not just those who reached a championship. A weak year-class (e.g. born 2011) shows up as a thin row years before it reaches the championships. Read a column downward (same age, different cohorts): a pale cell is a small cohort. "Strength" compares each cohort to the median of its age.

Born 9v10v11v12v13v14v15v16v17v18v Strength
Rollo
IKM
SM / NSM
2007 313 549 665 687 597 486 425 338 245 185 -3%
2008 336 549 720 664 610 564 461 371 294 203* +4%
2009 315 533 621 671 641 562 449 368 268* +1%
2010 337 482 663 726 678 600 493 380* +6%
2011 236 444 569 626 579 496 380* -11%
2012 226 446 584 636 584 498* -11%
2013 253 474 636 669 601* -6%
2014 266 488 587 538* -8%
2015 339 519 498* +7%
2016 349 363* +11%
RolloIKMSM / NSM pale = uncommon age (SM/NSM has no lower limit) age 13 swims both Rollo and IKM; SM/NSM is also open to adults (19+)

Cell = active swimmers; colour = size relative to the strongest cohort at that age (per view). * = the current year (2026) is still in progress. Strength compares to the same-sex age median.

Using this for planning

A weak cohort (a negative strength) means that birth year will bring fewer swimmers to the championships a few years out — the forecast can't invent them, so it takes action now (recruitment, club work, retention). A strong young cohort signals future growth. Right now 2011 and 2012 sit clearly below the median, while 2015–2016 look strong — so the pipeline is recovering behind the dip. Switch the view (Boys/Girls): the 2011/2012 weakness is mostly boys (2011 boys ~−19 % vs girls ~−7 %); the girls' own soft spot is 2013.

Based on all competition results (from 2016). Refreshes when new data is loaded.